Thursday :: May 13, 2004

Chivalry? We Got No Chivalry. We Don't NEED No Stinkin' Chivalry!

by pessimist

It is a natural tendency of the male of the species to be defensive about our females. It's a hard-wired trait that isn't easily inhibited. We all had mothers, and many of us have sisters, wives, daughters, girfirends, etc. Some cultures are defensive to the point of excess, and not always for wha t we in the West would consider a valid reason.

None the less, the local culture has to be respected. When in Rome, do as the Romans. When in Islamia, repect their culture and religion and do not disrespect their women.

It makes them mad.

As it would us in the West. Do we not get incensed when we hear of the 92-year-old great-grandmother made to strip at the airport when she hardly comes close to the terrorist profile?

The following articles include coarse language. I include it in order to accurately portray the outrage Muslim men must be feeling over our treatment of their women.

An Iraqi man cannot acknowledge having had a female relative in prison. The shame, he said, is bad enough if the woman was in an Iraqi jail. To have been taken by the Americans compounds the humiliation.

Focus shifts to jail abuse of women

For Huda Shaker, the humiliation began at a checkpoint on the outskirts of Baghdad. The American soldiers demanded to search her handbag. When she refused one of the soldiers pointed his gun towards her chest.

"He pointed the laser sight directly in the middle of my chest," said Professor Shaker, a political scientist at Baghdad University. "Then he pointed to his penis. He told me, 'Come here, bitch, I'm going to fuck you.'"

The incident is one of a number in which US soldiers are alleged to have abused, intimidated or sexually humiliated Iraqi women. According to Prof Shaker, several women held in Abu Ghraib jail were sexually abused, including one who was raped by an American military policeman and became pregnant. She has now disappeared.

Pausing on this article for a moment, Islamic culture is very strict when it comes to women. While certain attitudes toward women are abhorrent to us in the West, it is our obligation to understand that Muslim men aren't going to overlook a slight upon their family honor. I remember a Muslim woman who was pregnant by a US Marine who hadn't gotten permission to marry her yet. Her brother hanged her from a streetlight to avenge the perceived stain on the family honor. It still goes on, and not always is the culture Muslim.

Muslim women live with this every day of their lives. If they are raped it is not considered to be an excuse. She still is likely to be killed anyway:

A woman who is raped brings shame on her family in the Islamic world. In many cases, rape victims have been killed by their relatives to salvage family honor, although there is no evidence this has happened to women who have been prisoners in Iraq. "It is like being sentenced to death," said Sheik Mohammed Bashar Faydhi, a senior cleric based at Baghdad's largest Sunni mosque.

Going back to the first article:

Most of the coverage of the prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib has focused on Iraqi men. But there is compelling evidence that several female prisoners, who are in a minority at the jail, were abused as well. "A female colleague of mine was arrested and taken there. When I asked her after she was released what happened at Abu Ghraib she started crying," Prof Shaker said.

"Ladies here are afraid and shy of talking about such subjects. They say everything is OK. Even in a very advanced society in the west it is very difficult to talk about rape. But I think it happened."

Few women released from US detention have come forward to talk about their experiences in a Muslim society where rape is sometimes equated with shame and victims can be killed to salvage family honour.

According to the New Yorker magazine the photos and videos so far unreleased by the Pentagon show American soldiers "having sex with a female Iraqi prisoner", and a secret report by General Antonio Taguba into the scandal confirms that US guards videotaped and photographed naked female prisoners and that "a male MP [military police] guard" is shown "having sex with a female detainee".

Yesterday Prof Shaker, who began researching the subject this year for Amnesty International, said she believed the woman involved had been killed.
"The girl was called Noor. When I went to her house in Baghdad earlier this year she had disappeared. The neighbours said that she and her family had moved away."

Since the US military began its inquiry into prisoner abuse in January, many female detainees have been released from Abu Ghraib and the other US detention facilities across Iraq. But five women are still in solitary confinement in Abu Ghraib's notorious 1A cellblock where as many as 1,500 pictures were taken in November and December.

According to Rajaa Habib Khuzaai, an obstetrician who is one of three women on the US-appointed Iraqi governing council, none of the five has been raped or sexually abused. US officials allowed Dr Khuzaai to visit them yesterday and interview them privately. Two of the women told her that US soldiers had beaten them after their arrest in December and January while they were in custody at Baghdad international airport, before their transfer to Abu Ghraib. "They were a little embarrassed. They merely said they had been beaten and that was it," Dr Khuzaai told the Guardian.

She added: "They are now paid special attention. Conditions are OK and they have given them some privacy."

But there are unanswered questions as to why the women have been locked up without charge. According to Dr Khuzaai, two of the women are married to high-ranking and absconding Ba'ath party officials, two are accused of financing the Iraqi resistance, and one had a relationship with the director of Iraq's former secret police, the mukhabarat. Human rights campaigners say the US military frequently arrests wives and daughters during raids if the male suspect is not at home.

US officials have acknowledged detaining women in the hope of convincing male relatives to provide information: a strategy that is in violation of international law.

"The issue is the system," Nada Doumani of the International Committee of the Red Cross said yesterday. "It is an absence of judicial guarantees. People are being kept in custody without knowing what for. The system is not fair, precise or properly defined."

Senior US military officers who escorted journalists around Abu Ghraib on Monday admitted that rape had taken place in the cellblock where 19 "high-value" male detainees are also being held. Asked how it could have happened, Colonel Dave Quantock, who is now in charge of the prison's detention facilities, said: "I don't know. It's all about leadership. Apparently it wasn't there."

Journalists were forbidden from talking to the women, who are kept upstairs in windowless 2.5 metre by 1.5 metre cells. The women wailed and shouted. They were kept in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day, Col Quantock said, with only a Koran.

Other allegations being investigated are that a 12- or 13-year-old girl had been stripped naked in the block and paraded in front of male inmates.

Yesterday Prof Shaker said after her ordeal in February her friends dragged her back into the car and drove off. "I vowed never to talk to another American soldier," she said. She said the US and Britain should learn from the affair.

"You can't treat human beings in this way. I hope they have learned from this."

This is what we learn:

Consider this from Hal Muskat, who went through basic training at Ft. Dix, NJ, describing a frightening scene during bayonet practice for 1,000 young men:

"In between the call/response of, 'What's the spirit of bayonet?' 'Kill! Kill! Kill!' drill instructors (DIs) would pick up megaphones and scream, 'See those C-130s landing? They are bringing in bodies of dead Americans killed by gooks. The gooks murdered our soldiers! Do you want to be a body on that plane? I can't hear you? What's the spirit of bayonet?'

Every once in a while, a DI would pull several of us aside and give us lessons on the proper use of bayonet in performing a 'field abortion.' Stick the bayonet in the gook's cunt and pull up towards her throat. A dead gook in the womb saves Americans lives!'"

Or this, from Roger Domagalski, describing what he was told as a recruit and his duties after basic training: "From the first moment we arrived, we often heard the words, 'girls, ladies, sissies, pussies, and worse' when insulting us. Thus 'women' as a whole became a derogatory concept; very sexist and very dehumanizing...I had been dehumanized to such an extent that I completely lacked all empathy for these frightened, new trainees. Instead of treating them decently, I mistreated them as I had been mistreated. Once you dehumanize a person, you need to maintain control because such a person is liable to do anything, from the relatively mild 'hazing' I engaged in, to the Nazi-like terror tactics used by the guards against Iraqi prisoners. Yes, basic training works...all too well sometimes."

Where do these soldiers get this sort of behavioral training? From their officers, who learned it in the Academy. It's been going on a long while, so it's deeply entrenched in our officer corps and isn't going to be eradicated any time soon.

All you good American patriots out there - explain to me why it would be OK for you to be extremely angry if your women were treated in such a manner and not OK for any other culture, whose genetic make-up is essentially identical to ours, to get just as angry when their women are treated so disrespectfully and for them to desire retribution against us. Tell me why we are so superior that our treatment of their women immunizes us from such revenge. What justifies such barbaric behavior?

Are we to abandon our principles for oil? If so, how long before our own Heinrich Himmler emerges? Or a Pol Pot?

Is the role model for our military abroad to be Ghengis Khan?

Not in My Country. Not now. Not ever.

pessimist :: 5:28 PM :: Comments (0) :: Digg It!