Sunday :: Sep 10, 2006

Did George Let Osama Do It?

by pessimist

Thanks to PNAC and their "America needs a new Pearl Harbor' rants, Many Americans suspect U.S. government involvement or complicity in the 9/11 attacks:

A recent Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll of 1,010 Americans found that 36 percent suspect the U.S. government promoted the attacks or intentionally sat on its hands. Sixteen percent believe explosives brought down the towers. Twelve percent believe a cruise missile hit the Pentagon.

It's not too hard to believe that something conspiratorial occured with testimony like this:

Former transporation secretary Norman Mineta told the commission he arrived in the presidential operations center -- under the White House -- at 9:20 a.m. on Sept. 11 and found Vice President Cheney. When an aide asked Cheney about the hijacked plane fast approaching the Pentagon, Mineta says the vice president snapped that the "orders still stand." Mineta assumed the orders were to shoot the plane down. Conspiracy theorists interpret this to mean: Don't shoot it down.

Cheney later said he was not in the operations center until after the plane hit. The commission never mentioned Mineta's contradictory version.

Whatever did happen - and I personally lean toward Bu$hCo allowed this to happen on purpose [LIHOP] - there is one thing we all can agree on:

David Ray Griffin, Christian theologian and author of The New Pearl Harbor, .... says. "I want my life back.
But how can I ignore that we have become entranced by demonic power, so focused on lust for wealth and control that almost anything becomes possible?"

As when Disney - who once leased aircraft for United Airlines - appears to be naming American Airlines as negligent - complicit in the blame for 9/11?

God's Zilla really is roaming the streets of New York City.

Have a comment?

[Fair Use Notice roaming about on the back page]

Copyrighted [©] source material contained in this article is presented under the provisions of Fair Use.


This article contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of democracy, economic, environmental, human rights, political, scientific, and social justice issues, among others. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this article is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes.

pessimist :: 3:07 AM :: Digg It!