So when the majority of the Supreme Court ruled that money was speech, they did so under the assumption that you'd know who was speaking.
[A]n 8-1 majority upheld the disclosure laws as vital to democracy.
Do you think any of those who unleashed the tsunami of anonymous dollars cares or is the least bit concerned? I suspect it doesn't bother their pretty little heads much at all.
Nice democracy you have there. Good luck in keeping it.