Comments: Deregulation A Campaign Issue In 2008?

De-regulation or municipal ownership - Three times now I've been able to reap the benefits of not-for-profit electric rates. 25 years ago I was living in rural Ohio. My electricity was supplied by a local city that bought their power from a for profit company, Dayton Power & Light (DP&L). My in-laws lived about 5 miles away and tVeir power was directly from DP&L. My rates were much, much lower then my inlaws.

For the 18 years preceding last summer, I lived in southern Illinois. In harrisburg, we had CIPS (Central Illinois Power) now part of Ameren. At the time, late 80s/early 90s, we were paying nine and a half cents per kilo watt hour. We moved 20 miles away to Lake of Egypt and were part of a power co-operative, paying 5-3/4 cents per kwh.

Last summer we moved to wester Ohio. Our electricity is provided by the City of Piqua Utilities who buy their power from DP&L. I don't know what the rate is, but it is a lot less than people being billed by DP&L.

Munis and regulation are good for the average worker. For profits must meet certain Wall Street expectations and the pay the executives one hell of a lot more than muni employees get. And there are no dividends to pay to stockholders for the munis.

Posted by Chief at September 4, 2007 03:27 PM

Perry isn't proposing 12 plants. TXU has cut that to 3. The Tom Paine bit doesn't reflect developments in the story.

Posted by Old News at September 5, 2007 06:51 AM
Post a comment
HTML Tags:
<b>Bold</b> = Bold
<i>Italics</i> = Italics
<a href="http://www.url.com/">Linked text</a> = Linked text

Note: comments from signed in commenters will show up right away. If you are not signed in, your comment will not appear until it has been approved.




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

In order to post a comment, you must answer the following question.