Yes, eriposte, we know you like Hilary.
Posted by Luce Imaginary at December 27, 2007 08:15 AMLuce Imaginary,
Happy holidays to you too! No Obama related post is complete without your one line sentence - that too with the always predictable mis-spelling of Sen. Clinton's first name. Thanks for enriching the great debate about the Politics of Hope, Change and Optimism!
Posted by eriposte at December 27, 2007 08:21 AMI wonder if Luce's IP matches Bedittohead's. He's obviously waiting with baited breath for your every post - I think Luce is a big fan!
Yet another nice post, eriposte, thanks.
Posted by iamcoyote at December 27, 2007 08:31 AMI couldn't care less who any one person supports, but when a regular poster begins to support only one candidate and makes nearly every post about supporting that candidate and attacking that candidate's main rival, then the posts cease being about providing knowledge and insight and start being about propaganda and control. We get that you like Clinton, eriposte. Congratulations on becoming her mini version of Fox News. You are about as fair and balanced as your larger counterpart.
I'll start reading you again when you start acting like someone interested in providing context and insight, rather than being one candidate's megaphone.
Posted by turtleguy at December 27, 2007 09:21 AMAgain, no rebuttal of the post. Just babble.
Posted by snark at December 27, 2007 09:49 AMTurtleguy,
Thanks for the holiday wishes! In the meantime, when you get a chance to actually *read* my post, make sure you read the part about Obama having attacked *Edwards* (not Clinton) on "special interests" and also the part about Obama having attacked Edwards and Clinton (not just Clinton) from the right on mandates for healthcare.
Of course, I know that since you are part of the Straight-Talking Reality Based Community, these are not *facts* but just propaganda. Which is why, per your guidance, I'll send a fax over to Rupert Murdoch announcing that I'll accept his offer to pay me $1 Billion to run Fox News.
Posted by eriposte at December 27, 2007 09:51 AMGreat post, eriposte.
What do you think about the NYT article today about the communication between Edwards and the 527 group. The message was given to them by a rival campaign.
Posted by Jamie at December 27, 2007 10:41 AMJamie,
I am out of access to the net for the most part, except during brief intervals like now. I am hoping to get some time during the weekend to catch up on the latest news and cover some of the developments - especially the renewed debate on "experience".
Posted by eriposte at December 27, 2007 03:14 PM