And I thought the post is about Obama's Rovian campaign. Wrong again!
Posted by Koshembos at February 10, 2008 01:16 PMJeebus Mary...even though this diary is short and veryy easy to read/follow and stunningly Rovian/orwellian having absoeffinglutely nothing whatsoever to do with HilBama events, even you've got the "minders" coming to this thread taking pot shots.
Why do people feel so threatened by this blog for having another point of view and presenting it...sigh. I can't even begin to imagine the hate mail that has come to you all at this site..and we are suppose to be all on the same side and in the same party...yikes!
Posted by emal at February 10, 2008 04:34 PMThis weekend, Obama not only swept four elections in four radically different states, but IN EACH ONE he TROUNCED Hillary, who is now frantically shaking up her campaign team. Yet, there is not one positive word/entry here about Obama. Not one. There is an entry about how "undemocratic" caucuses are, though. This speaks volumes for the wild Hillary bias at this blog.
Posted by at February 10, 2008 05:16 PMThanks for the announcement, Patrick.
Did everyone get that? Obama won something and attention must be paid!
There, happy? Now, if you can't stick to the topic, fuck off.
Posted by iamcoyote at February 10, 2008 05:26 PMMary, I read your longer post at PV, and it was great! Thanks for the rundown - I had no idea Abramoff was involved, but why not? Didn't Bush spend some time campaigning in Alabammie when he should have been doing time in the TX elite squadron? Wheels within wheels, and all corrupt and stinking of rotting flesh.
Posted by iamcoyote at February 10, 2008 06:03 PM"Fuck off," huh, iamcoyote? That is nice. Very respectful. Getting nervous and desperate as Scarlet O'Hara, uh, I mean Hillary Clinton, is starting to fade? Is this how Hillary supporters act as their candidate struggles?
All I did was point out an obvious bias in this blog.
I'm sure if Hillary had won all four contexts by a 2-1 or 3-1 margin that this site would have been silent on that fact... right... sure... uh-huh...
I'm also sure if I wrote to you to "fuck off," that your little Hillary-borg friends would ban me. Of course, I'm sure they'll defend your offensiveness on this blog.
Nice.
Posted by at February 10, 2008 06:27 PMSiegelman has been royally shat upon!
Actually Patrick you can "fuck off", coming in here with anon. tripe!
The Hillary-borg's true colors are now showing. Another "fuck off" for simply pointing out the obvious: this is a pro-Hillary site! Can't even muster a weak post in praise of the stunning Obama victories this weekend. Heck, even Hillary herself acknowledges she's in DEEP trouble.
Classy.
Posted by at February 11, 2008 05:30 AMJust so you know Patrick, I voted for Obama, and I've defended him.
Problem is you're a Hillary hater. I don't speak for everyone but we don't need crap like that.
Will you vote for Hillary in the GE if she gets the nod? I sure as hell will! 4 more years of a republi-con and the Union will be history.
Posted by Seven of Six at February 11, 2008 05:54 AMGosh, smart people stop reading a blog when they are disappointed in what's covered. Why are people still here if they're so disgusted?
Posted by Sharon at February 11, 2008 05:55 AMthe word "troll" comes to mind (or just the typical hatemonger)
Posted by Sharon at February 11, 2008 05:56 AMI wrote nothing about Hillary, pro or con, simply pointed out that this blog, which claims not to be biased in favor of Hillary, can't even bring itself to write a positive analysis after Obama won big all weekend...
That is reality.
Posted by at February 11, 2008 06:11 AM