If McCallum's client were a private company, this kind of thing would be grounds for a malpractice suit. It's clear that he's not acting in his client's (that's us) best interests.
Posted by Matt Davis at June 10, 2005 09:29 AMAnd surprise, surprise. Guess who is on the District Appeals Court now. Timing is everything, huh?
Posted by Mary at June 10, 2005 09:31 AMSo $120 billion gift is not enough ?
Posted by emeldir at June 10, 2005 03:31 PMWell, it's not exactly that it's not enough. Thing is, since the government already had a number on the table, and that number was tied to a specific addiction-abatement program, the new number also needed to be tied to some kind of program. In true BushCo style, the new program made no sense, even to the defendants.
Posted by Matt Davis at June 10, 2005 06:10 PM