Comments: The last refuge

Times Publisher Arthur O. Sulzberger's response, begs the question --

What Sulzberger family photos does the BushCo / CIA possess?

That would spawn this BushCo Cock Sucking behavior?

Posted by ck at July 6, 2005 08:47 PM

This is not the last refuge of scoundrels. These are:

The National Guard watching everything we do on this blog is.

Rick Santorum says slavery not all that bad after all!

Posted by phidipides at July 6, 2005 09:28 PM

The vast majority of the Income Tax cuts went to the people who paid income taxes.

Sadly for those on the bottom half, that doesn't amount to much, as the bottom half of wage earners in America pay only 4% (four percent) of the total individual income taxes paid.

How do you cut zero?

Posted by Bones at July 6, 2005 11:10 PM

A couple of days not visiting the LC because work has a funny way of getting in the way of pleasurable things—and a lull allowing me to return—gives me a bloody déjà vu jolt. Bones is still at it, and what must be a horrible to withstand phobia that seems to keep him chained to whatever notions (but most certainly having to do with those good for nuttin’ no taxpayer folks) drags on, and on and on. Yes, and thus regardless of what the subject matter of the thread happens to be.

Anyway, fed up with the same ranting, but mainly to try to put his mind at ease, I dare to suggest but, respectfully, of course, the following: That since he appears to like this business of taxes and the whole entire lot so much he (and those others who fall under the elite category of good for everything folks) open their own blog. Though realizing that names are immaterial, one that comes to mind (and hope he likes) is this one—Revolting Tax Payers Hindquarters.

Hindquarters in which what’s going on out there (but ONLY in the tax world), what’s there to know (but ONLY about taxes), and how to teach the brainless to fill a 1040 in a jiffy would be discussed at sickenum. In the still yet to be drafted documents to outline Hindquarters purpose, perhaps the bellow suggested drastic actions to do away with the good for nuttin’ no taxpayer folks could be the first order of business. And the main business would be to be rehash to death drastic actions that, if fully implemented (as they should), hopefully would obtain a tri-fold net result—at the very least:
1) If the drastic actions fly the first result would be that the pockets of the good for everything folks will be liberated from the bloody burden of having to pull along the good for nuttin’ no taxpayer folks; and,
2) Since in the process of the hard to bear “pulling” all these poor souls are probably also being forced to foot bills that the good for nuttin’ no taxpayer folks should shoulder (regardless of “due to” nimieties, such as alleged lack of work and jelly-soft excuses of the like), with the suggested drastic actions he and his friends, hopefully, will go away (+taking with them any pitiable sighs that may ensue with this here suggestions); and,
3) Obviously, upon implementation of suggested drastic actions the world would be rid of a healthy number of good for nuttin’ no taxpayer folks in a jiffy. And, what’s wrong with that? Eh?

The suggestions that may put little minds at ease also come tri-fold:
Sug. #1) =>The War on Terra-type drastic action
Since it is already established that they are good for nuttin’, in order to make their lives somewhat meaningful force the good for nuttin’ no taxpayer folks to become the cannon fodder of choice. (Why waste a single good for a lot taxpayer folk in wars and/or yucky things of this nature?)

Sug. #2) =>The Nero-type drastic action
Use the good for nuttin’ no taxpayer folks as lion fodder.

Sug. #3) =>The Franco-type drastic action
Find the nearest available wall and shoot the hell out of the good for nuttin’ no taxpayer folks.

Since…who needs them, anyway? Suggestion #3 costs could be greatly reduced if the good for nuttin’ no taxpayer folk had an ounce of decency and, on their own accord, decided to die ASAP!

Paz to all, and may everyone be able to pay hefty taxes.

Posted by quídam at July 7, 2005 02:41 AM

Since when is covering for a criminal considered a prideful thing to do? Judith Miller should ROT in jail for her so-called principles.

Posted by Sharon at July 7, 2005 04:18 AM
Post a comment
HTML Tags:
<b>Bold</b> = Bold
<i>Italics</i> = Italics
<a href="http://www.url.com/">Linked text</a> = Linked text

Note: comments from signed in commenters will show up right away. If you are not signed in, your comment will not appear until it has been approved.




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

In order to post a comment, you must answer the following question.