Comments: Uranium from Africa and the Senate (SSCI) Report: Part 3A-3

You said in one of the earlier posts that the sole basis of the "foreign intel" report was the Niger forgeries. But the US did not (supposedly) have the forgeries until Oct, 2002. Wilson went in Feb, 2002. I think I know where you are going, but I hope this detail is cleared up one way or the other. I look forward to your next post. Thanks for all the work.

Posted by Mimikatz at July 26, 2005 09:40 PM

The post was accurate because it stated the position of the CIA. Yes, it seems confusing but my next post will explain.

Posted by eriposte at July 26, 2005 09:52 PM
Post a comment
HTML Tags:
<b>Bold</b> = Bold
<i>Italics</i> = Italics
<a href="http://www.url.com/">Linked text</a> = Linked text

Note: comments from signed in commenters will show up right away. If you are not signed in, your comment will not appear until it has been approved.




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

In order to post a comment, you must answer the following question.