Comments: Why those No's matter

I did hear that Harriet has never been a judge. Inexperience might help us.

Posted by bbtb at September 29, 2005 04:05 PM

I'm still hoping we'll be pleasantly surprised by Roberts.

Posted by CG at September 29, 2005 04:40 PM

CG, I salute your optimism.

And if it happens, I'll be right out there saying I was wrong. And glad to be wrong.

Posted by Duckman GR at September 29, 2005 04:43 PM

We'll find out soon! The word is that the next nominee will be announced tomorrow.

Posted by pessimist at September 29, 2005 05:31 PM

"The word is that the next nominee will be announced tomorrow."

Well, that should suffice as a good distraction away from DeLay and Judith Miller.

Posted by Judith at September 29, 2005 08:16 PM

I say he goes with the Hispanic Irish broad.

Posted by snark at September 29, 2005 08:20 PM

Whatever shattered soul Bush selects, it will drag us further into the dawning dark ages. Democrats, Republicans, all seem to agree its the right direction.

Posted by at September 29, 2005 10:07 PM
Post a comment
HTML Tags:
<b>Bold</b> = Bold
<i>Italics</i> = Italics
<a href="http://www.url.com/">Linked text</a> = Linked text

Note: comments from signed in commenters will show up right away. If you are not signed in, your comment will not appear until it has been approved.




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

In order to post a comment, you must answer the following question.