"I'm proud as an Argentine to repudiate the presence of this human trash, George Bush," said former football star Diego Maradona.
Perhaps the country will finally get ready and do it in the congessional elections next year. I hope so.
All the old crew from 2004 are war felons. Knew it a long time ago, and lying to start the war is only one of their vast crimes in a long list from this horrible war.
[sigh] I'm supposed to go out, see The History of Violence after a good enchilada from the taco joint. It's supposed to get even better.
I'm sick to death of feeling ashamed just because I want a humble life of a movie and an enchilada. Our men and women are dying and being brutally maimed in the field for nothing. Why do we ask so much from such a tiny, trusting corps of patriots?
Bring our men home, tell the truth, use 50% less oil, throw all of them in federal prison, and apologize.
We don't have any options. We could be relatively free and honest world citizens again. We didn't always walk around in shame and horror, not the country I knew.
Posted by paradox at November 5, 2005 05:15 PMYet again you are wrong. The Repub's were not stonewalling the report. There was bi-partisan agreement that the report would be released in mid-November. Harry Reid knew that and decided to take pre-emptive action (something they usually say they're against).
As usual this will blow up in your face. Before this stunt by Reid, the report was to be released with quotes from both sides of the isle regarding Saddam and WMD's. But the source of the quotes were not going to be identified. Well, that's changed now. Pat Roberts is going to make sure the Dem's quotes are going to be made public.
Harry Reid and the rest of the Dem's continue to ignore their own history of failure every time they focus in this issue.
No options? How about coming up with a plan for the future.
That's right. You guys don't have one. Haven't since about 1976.
Posted by The Real Truth at November 5, 2005 05:25 PMYou did say one thing that I agree with you on: the real patriots are the ones fighting the war, whether you and I see eye to eye on it or not.
Posted by The Real Truth at November 5, 2005 05:34 PMThe Real Truth,
You're people lied to take this country to war. They sold out our national security to keep power and enrich their political supporters. EVERYBODY ON THIS PLANET with half a brain or an ounch of integrity can easily see that. The fact you don't and that you still support these people makes you a terrible American and a disgusting excuse for a human being.
Good day.
The Truth
No options? How about coming up with a plan for the future.
The plan is to clean up the mess you drooling idiots have caused, and are causing still.
Yee-haw is not a plan, but ya'll been riding that one for about 5 years now.
Roberts has been stonewalling phase 2 at the behest of Big time Dick, and everyone knows it.
The American public wants this discussion and it will happen.
But keep on whistling happy tunes. That Wilson indictment worked out real good for ya, huh?
Posted by SnarkyShark at November 5, 2005 05:37 PMThe Anti-Truth, TRAITOR!
Posted by Judith at November 5, 2005 05:57 PMone struggles to imagine in what universe the real truth thinks he/she deserves that name. Admittedly, one of the thinks that graduates of Propaganda U learn at the ol' alma mater is that double-talk is a critical element of the propaganda robot mission.
The fact is, Roberts has made it perfectly clear that he has no intention of actually doing any heavy lifting on this investigation. His footdragging has been obvious, and i doubt that we will see anything but a whitewash. We certainly won't see any difficult questions answered.
But the issue with clowns like the real truth isn't that Roberts is a lying sack of shit: that's been obvious for a very long time. The real issue is that clowns like the real truth think that an investigation of how the administration did or did not misuse and mischaracterize the available intel should have anything to do with democrats, who were, perhaps it has escaped the real truth's attention, not part of the administration.
Sorry, son: the facts are already quite clear, and now they are getting some attention. The shallow little people that make up the bush administration wanted a war with iraq, and certainly nothing like reality was going to be allowed to stand in the war's way.
And now, 2.5 years, several thousand American deaths, many thousand Iraqi deaths, tens of thousands of american wounded, an unknown number of iraqi wounded, and billions of dollars later, the public is catching on that we are being led (if you can call it that) by an administration that was so eager for war that it gussied up the intel to sell an untrue scare story. when you haven something intelligent to say about that, real truth, we'd be happy to hear it. otherwise, clowns like you should just have the decency to keep you traps closed on this subject.
Posted by howard at November 5, 2005 06:01 PMReal True Traitors,
Exposing the Bu$h polices of greed and corruption will leave the Republi cons with no substantial base-- I can hardly wait!
Coblin
Judith, I thought it was Republicans who were always calling people traitors. Thanks for correcting that bit of mis-information. Honestly, are you ever going to have intelligent posts are are you going to spend the rest of your life taking cheapshots (not just at me but at others who dare to disagree with you).
SnarkyShark - Keep thinking that Wilson is going to your savior. Just like Burkett, Kerry, Sheehan etc. Wilson is a liar and a fraud and if the case goes to trial he is going to be exposed - big time.
BTW, the American public did have this discussion last year and you lost. My take on it is that the public is not paying much attention to it at all. When Libby is exonerated however, they will be and they will see once again a party who is like a broken record.
"The real issue is that clowns like the real truth think that an investigation of how the administration did or did not misuse and mischaracterize the available intel should have anything to do with democrats, who were, perhaps it has escaped the real truth's attention, not part of the administration."
I don't know if you caught it or not, but Bush wasn't President in 1998 when Bill Clinton looked at the same intel and said the same thing Bush did.
I have a question though: of all those deaths you listed, why did you not list the number of terrorists that have been killed? Maybe because that would defeat you argument?
BTW, I will not "keep my trap shut". I actually beleive in the right to free speech even if it is from people calling me a traitor and a terrible American. Too bad you don't.
Of course I know you want me to shutup because you can't deal with anyone with a different opinion. If I was as stupid as you say I am, then my posts would not bother you at all.
The Real Truth
As usual, you rethugli-cons live in your own reality or actually devoid of all reality, morality, ethics, honesty, etc. as the Buddhists call "sunya" or emptiness. Unfortunately. Unfortunately for you, finally (I hope so), American people are waking up to the reality of being robbed of their livelihood by the Bush cabal in every sphere and "realize" that they have duped. My dear friend - time in hell is coming fast for you rethugli-cons. I cannot wait!!
I love paris in the spring time
I love paris in the fall
I love paris in the summer when it sizzles
I love paris in the winter when it drizzles
I love paris every moment
every moment of the years
I love paris, why oh why do I love paris
Because the intifada now is there
SnarkyShark - Keep thinking that Wilson is going to your savior. Just like Burkett, Kerry, Sheehan etc. Wilson is a liar and a fraud and if the case goes to trial he is going to be exposed - big time
But I thought Wilson was going to be indicted, and scooter vindicated? Could you have been gasp wrong?
I don't know if you caught it or not, but Bush wasn't President in 1998 when Bill Clinton looked at the same intel and said the same thing Bush did.
I guess you didnt catch the part where we didn't invade Iraq and put ourselves into jepordy in ways you brain dead rove-bots can't concieve..
I actually beleive in the right to free speech even if it is from people calling me a traitor and a terrible American.
You know, when I was pulling traffic duty at Camp Casy some lard ass on a motorcycle drove by real slow and called me a traitor.
Instead of crying like a little bitch, I took it as a badge of honor. Now that the tables are turned, I do not bleed for you cupcake.
Your talking points are stale, your composition is weak, and quite frankly you are a chickenhawk coward. Its one thing to whine about respect, quite another to earn it.
Who am I? 4 yrs RA, 11B1pc2.
If you dont know what that means, have a vetern explain it to you.
Posted by SnarkyShark at November 5, 2005 07:20 PMIf you are a veteran and subscribe to this left wing crap, then I pity you.
Posted by at November 5, 2005 07:40 PMYou can stick that pity up your ass anon coward.
Or were you posting from Tikrit?
And I consider myself a moderate, but to Facist I'm sure that seems like left wing.
Posted by SnarkyShark at November 5, 2005 07:44 PMCould be the big explosion here. More on this plus the NY Times link here.
While the al-Libi "evidence" is now deemed false, how was this found out? And what interrogation techniques were used?
Posted by The Heretik at November 5, 2005 07:57 PMI love paris, why oh why do I love paris
Because the intifada now is there
Two sad facts are: 1. Most Americans have no idea what your singing about.
2. The shape of the European economy is such that other cities may soon see the same things.
And what interrogation techniques were used?
What is Anal glowsticking?
I'll take club gitmo for $1000 Alex.
Posted by SnarkyShark at November 5, 2005 08:15 PMI don't know if you caught it or not, but Bush wasn't President in 1998 when Bill Clinton looked at the same intel and said the same thing Bush did.
Clinton bomb Iraq in 1998 and blew up the WMD's So they did not have any, hence we did not invade DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by goose1 at November 5, 2005 08:17 PMWhat is the freakin' obsession with posting by some stupid name, and then going bonkers when somebody posts with out a name? Get over it.
Posted by boredtotearswiththis at November 5, 2005 09:14 PMThe only people who do post with an email address are just self promoting their own websites. Geez, this is lame.
Posted by at November 5, 2005 09:15 PMoh, poor misguided real truth: as an authentic propaganda robot, you, of course, have no choice but to spew the current line, which makes you look like a blithering fool.
You would honestly have us think that what bill clinton said in 1998 is exactly comparable to claiming that saddam had reconstituted his nuclear weapons program or that we didn't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud or that saddam was likely, any given day, to arm terrorists with wmds. You would think that it was Clinton who had to withdraw 16 overstated words in the SOTU. You would think it was Clinton that wrote to the Congress in March, 2003, that there was no diplomatic way to get Iraq to live up to the UN resolutions requiring it to disarm and therefore, we needed to go to war.
Now, it is true that Clinton, in air strikes widely deried by the propaganda robots of 1998, did actually eliminate saddam's remaining either chemical or biological weapons capacity (i can never remember which), and so i can see how actual effectiveness against such a threat as saddam posed may have confused the ol' synapses.
you know, fareed zakaria wrote last sunday that the current conservative movement is filled with people who are ideologically sound second-raters, and when i got to your pompous reaction to being asked to please keep your mouth closed rather than participate in an ill-informed and offensive way, it's not an attack on your free speech rights.
it's a test of your humanity.
which, i'm happy to say, you failed convincingly. don't they teach you manners at Propaganda U?
Posted by howard at November 5, 2005 09:27 PMOf course, it's Clinton, Howard, geez, didn't you know that? That's Kool-Aid 101. Lie. Spin. Deceive. But never, EVER, admit mistake or incompetence.
Posted by sf at November 5, 2005 09:45 PMBTW, the American public did have this discussion last year and you lost.
I think the American people may have a different opinion, now that they're starting to get the real truth. What say ye, "Real Truth" ?
Posted by at November 5, 2005 10:21 PMYou folks are all missing the big picture that the 'real' truth presents. King George went to war on fabrications, just as the 'real' truth does with his/her assertions:
There was bi-partisan agreement that the report would be released in mid-November.
Saying it's so doesn't make it so, whether one 'knows' where the WMD are hidden and won't tell, or one invents 'agreements' between the party memberships of the Congress without attribution.
Posted by pessimist at November 6, 2005 01:46 AMJudith, I thought it was Republicans who were always calling people traitors.
Why would anyone think this? I mean, there are actual traitors in this world - traitors are not unicorns. But to call someone a traitor is a serious charge to level. It must be approached with caution, and reserved only for the people who genuinely deserve the label. Example: supporting the falsifying of intelligence and lying to Congress in order to send American troops to their deaths for no good reason and making us less safe and bankrupting the country in the process = traitor. Not fitting into American culture at large, being Muslim or questioning the wisdom of the president's policies = not a traitor. See, this is easy. :)
I don't know if you caught it or not, but Bush wasn't President in 1998 when Bill Clinton looked at the same intel and said the same thing Bush did.
Thanks for making me laugh. Laughing is always good. Not only did Clinton bomb Iraq during his presidency, as noted by others here, but Cheney and Rumsfeld and that whole gang that started the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) actually approached Clinton with their lust for war, mentioning their whole "regime change" idea in Iraq, whereupon Clinton promptly showed them the door.
BTW, I will not "keep my trap shut". I actually beleive in the right to free speech even if it is from people calling me a traitor and a terrible American. Too bad you don't.
Yeah, right, the people here don't actually believe in free speech. When someone gets frustrated, and in an admittedly angry moment says 'shut up,' it's tantamount to saying, 'the first amendment ought to be abandoned so that people whose opinions I do not like can be permanently censored.' "I believe in free speech;...too bad you don't"? That's the kind of line I used when I was arguing in jr. high school.
BTW, the American public did have this discussion last year and you lost.
What the? The lies leading up to the war played very little part in the debates in Bush vs. Kerry. Moreover, there's a lot more hard evidence now to prove the lies - Downing Street Memos and such - and people in general are starting to wake up. And I thought Bush and gang made such a big deal of the election actually having been won on "morals," you know, the code word for hating gay people. All sorts of analysis followed the election about the 50/50 split between Kerry and Bush being tipped by the turnout Republicans generated by stirring up hatred for gay people, right?
My take on it is that the public is not paying much attention to it at all.
That's a tremendously astute observation considering Bush's approval ratings have dropped into the 30s and a majority now wants him impeached if he lied about the war.
one struggles to imagine in what universe the real truth thinks he/she deserves that name.
Heh, it's unfortunately this odd universe in which we've currenlty found ourselves - the one where the constant hums of FOX News and rabid right-wing talk show hosts still warrant use of the term "liberal media;" where one can find various fluff pieces on local and national news stations forcing a listen to Comedy Central for a better understanding of the hard news facts that transpired that day; where Clear Skies Initiatives lighten pollution controls; where the Red Sox and White Sox are the two most recent World Series champions and where Germany argues for peace but the US pushes ahead with pre-emptive war.
To think, just five years ago we had peace, prospertity and a record surplus.
Of course I know you want me to shutup because you can't deal with anyone with a different opinion. If I was as stupid as you say I am, then my posts would not bother you at all.
Posted by Liveliest Crib at November 6, 2005 03:00 AMoops...forgot to erase the last little part in my post above
Posted by Liveliest Crib at November 6, 2005 03:04 AM"Example: supporting the falsifying of intelligence and lying to Congress in order to send American troops to their deaths for no good reason and making us less safe and bankrupting the country in the process = traitor."
One who betrays another's trust or is false to an obligation or duty.
Liveliest Crib, I rest my case. The far-right neocons are betraying the principals of this great Nation by continuing to support GWB. If you align yourself with a traitor, you are also a traitor. The Real Truth doesn't love this Country, he loves the idea of a fascist state and approves of this pResident's use of state terror and propaganda. He appoves of the total control of the media and intimidation of political rivals, and he believes in disassembling the existing democratic government system. Read his own words. He is a TRAITOR.
"Honestly, are you ever going to have intelligent posts are are you going to spend the rest of your life taking cheapshots (not just at me but at others who dare to disagree with you)."
LOL Hey Traitor, your the Queen of cheap shots and unintelligent posts. Stop projecting that part of yourself you cannot look at on me.
Posted by Judith at November 6, 2005 05:02 AMI am angry with myself right now. Once again, we have allowed this troll to hijack this discussion about Reid. Congratulations troll.
Posted by Judith at November 6, 2005 05:08 AMThere was an international effort to isolate and contain Saddam Hussien. What Clinton said and did was a part of that effort. If he made an allegation or threatened force or used force it was designed to isolate, contain, and pressure Saddam. It was designed to ensure he had no WMD and make it so he was not a threat. And it worked. Perfectly…. For everybody except Halliburton… But more importantly, it worked WITHOUT creating the disaster this invasion and occupation has been. To site this perfectly effective effort as justification for the treasonous, fraudulent meat grinder of a disaster Bush and Cheney got us into is as illogical as can be and perversely ironic to say the least.
"The Real Truth" or any other lying sack of BushCo garbage should be branding a coward unless he/she comments on the BushCo sec state quote below.
"We should constantly be reviewing our policies, constantly be looking at those sanctions to make sure that they are directed toward that purpose. That purpose is every bit as important now as it was ten years ago when we began it. And frankly they have worked. He has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors. So in effect, our policies have strengthened the security of the neighbors of Iraq, and these are policies that we are going to keep in place." - Colin Powell - FEBUARY 24, 2001
steve soto
preach it, brother.
preach it
louder and longer
they say the truth will make you free. i reserve judgement as to whether the bush lies and cover-ups will be fully sexposed, but i cant help but hope freedom is near.
We went to war over a lie. The name of the liar was not Al-libi. The name of the liar was George W. Bush. That George W. Bush's informant was named Alibi has to be proof of intelligent design.
Posted by jerry at November 6, 2005 09:26 AMThe Real Stooge said:
"No options? How about coming up with a plan for the future."
You mean like the one Bush Junior and his handlers came up with for post-occupation Iraq?
Before you start making claims about Democrats that are fully unfounded, maybe you'd ought to take a look at your side of the political divide, you obfuscating hypocrite.
Posted by at November 6, 2005 09:41 AMThe Real Stooge said:
"The Repub's were not stonewalling the report. There was bi-partisan agreement that the report would be released in mid-November."
Wrong, liar! Even your favorite fishwrap, The Moonie Times, debunked (inadvertantly, mind you) this talking point in their Thursday edition.
Are you stupid, or just locked into your inane, dishonest talking points.
One more thing: Repubs should NOT have an apostrophe in this case (as you use it, it's plural, not possessive). Are you still in junior high school or what?
Posted by at November 6, 2005 09:44 AMwe may have everything else we need - mounds of evidence, support of the American people, etc. - but without a majority vote the Congress won't impeach... though this administration is clearly GUILTY, GOPs will hold onto power at any cost... that's really their only "virtue" to speak of... still, it's right to take these actions... we shouldn't have to force the Prez to be honest... I wonder how he's sleeping while his house is falling down around him?
Posted by Pete Bogs at November 6, 2005 09:48 AM"Real Truth" writes:
There was bi-partisan agreement that the report would be released in mid-November. Harry Reid knew that and decided to take pre-emptive action (something they usually say they're against).
Care to provide us any evidence of this alleged agreement to release the report in mid-November? A link, maybe?
Posted by at November 6, 2005 10:48 AM15,000,000 plus people times ten knew before the Iraq invasion what is coming to light now in the MSM like it's "new hard evidence" of the lies fostered upon us by this most insidious and corrupt administration.
But finally people are actually realizing they've been punked by a war mongering, profiteering, corrupt group of facists. Bullshit.
You'd have to be as brain-dead as Terri Shaivo not to see this coming. I'm convinced you have to be one of three thigns to still support bush-
1) mis-informed, which can be corrected
2) stupid, which can't be corrected
3) a fasist, which makes you the mortal enemy of all that is American.
Ha
very funny site
Maybe you should have a contest on the date that Bush will be impeached.
Oh by the way - I'll take never
Posted by brian at November 6, 2005 11:36 AMYes, impeach Bush but impeach Cheney first.
Posted by BroD at November 6, 2005 11:48 AMA report of the nature mentioned in the NYT article is the sort that would accompanying dozens of other reports and opinions leading up to a particular action. Sure, taken alone it would seem to discredit the need for war. But alone is not how it was viewed (if indeed it was seen at all) in the months leading up to the war in Iraq.
Democrats are grasping at threads in order to keep the focus on White House wrong-doing. Meanwhile France is burning at the hand of Islam. And it will only get worse.
Posted by techunter at November 6, 2005 12:06 PMyou know what, Mr. Real Truth? Saying that democrats have made mistakes is not exactly the same thing as saying Bush and his cronies are right. Fine, we've made mistakes. But who led us into a terrible war? who is creating even more of those scary terrorists every minute? Who has lied to the American people about something slightly more important than - a blow job? Your lovable, deeply unintelligent Mr. Bush. I'm so sorry for you that you have too much pride to admit that the gig is up. But when you can - we'll still be here for you. Because humanism is the next big wave in this universe. And as a humanist - I welcome you to THE REAL TRUTH.
Posted by samantha at November 6, 2005 12:15 PMI lived in France for many years, so I can assure you this has very little to do with Muslims, and very much to do with the way the French refuse to allow any other races into their very very narrow world. It's an insult to Muslims who are peace-loving to continually point fingers at them. This situation has much more in common with the Civil Rights demonstrations of the 60's than the war in Iraq, I'm afraid. Which is not to say that violent riots are the right way to go - only that there are definitely some long standing problems in France pushing this forward - by the way, there are THOUSANDS of Arab Jews in Paris! They aren't all Muslims -
Posted by samantha at November 6, 2005 12:20 PMThis sudden touching concern for the poor french by the right wing is hilarous. Right up there with the completely inane idea that Republicans feel deeply for the poor oppressed Iraqies.
Except for tuesday, when the wingers feel the whole mid-east should be nuked into a big radio-active parking lot.
Freedom fries, freedom toast, any of this sound familiar? How bout cheese-eating-surrender-monkeys?
No?
God, ya'll are so easy to mock.
Posted by SnarkyShark at November 6, 2005 12:49 PMA lie is a lie. There is no republican or democrat about it. George W. Bush, President of The United States of America lied about the reasons for invading Iraq. George W. Bush, President of The United States of America lied to Congress, the Senate, the American people and to the world from day one. He knew he was lying. How many other lies have the American people and the world suffered at the behest of the George W. Bush and Vice President Cheney? Impeach George W. Bush.
Posted by Jerry at November 6, 2005 01:10 PMImpeachment. For a real reason.
Damn. I've got wood now.
Posted by actor212 at November 6, 2005 02:39 PM3) a fasist, which makes you the mortal enemy of all that is American. Posted by gonnuts
BINGO
Posted by Judith at November 6, 2005 02:41 PMAmen, Jerry! Sadly, I don't see impeachment happening - not with this congress. But when Dubya rightfully (hehe) takes his place among the worst of the worst - hell, he makes Nixon look good - then the world will know that our country's dictatorship has finally been abolished. I hope these black days will pass. And trolls? I also hope you realize that some of the horrible, self mutilating terrorists are virtually children - much like yours - pushed past their limits by poverty and oppression. Those are the "recruits." Is the solution MORE oppression? You know - I don't think so. The situation in Iraq is a breeding ground. And it isn't going to get any better.
Posted by samantha at November 6, 2005 02:43 PMFor those of weak memories: Most of us knew the "reasons" for the Iraq Invasions were either fake, lies, misrepresentations or outright GOP deceptions well before the invasion. We sat by and watched the Democrat Senate representatives rubber stamp a Bush directive that basically gave him carte blanche, all the while realizing that he'd do what he wanted anyway. And what he wanted was to prove to his Daddy that he had a bigger Manhood. AND, to carry out the wishes of a group he may, or may not, have fully understood, PNAC, headed by his vice president, Dick Cheney.
Posted by T2 at November 6, 2005 06:07 PMThis response is to Brian, who asked for a prediction on when Bush will be Impeached. OK, sounds like a great contest to me! I'd say March 23, 2007.
I figure it this way, when the Rethuglicans get their heads handed to them for Culture of Corruption they have created, then the Democrats will take control of CONgress on January 20th, 2007. That provides a little over 3 months for the Televised Hearings that will overwhelmingly prove we should have Chimpeachment! Then, figure about a week for the actual impeachment process to work it's way from the house to the actual trial in the Senate.
I for one, have stocked up on recordable DVD's. I'm going through alot for Fitzmas, but if I have to, I'll buy another 200-300 blanks to save for the hearings when someone says:
"What did the President know, and when did he know it?"
Posted by Ron Russell at November 6, 2005 07:41 PMSamantha,
Do not defile the good name of Nixon by comparing him to Bush.
Nixon signed the legislation that created the EPA, spoke of National Health Care and kept the space program going so that we could land on the moon. He didn't want to end the Vietnam war, but at least he reacted to the National Mood and brought the troops home.
Now, he did alot of bad things like escalating and expanding the War, creating the Southern Strategy, etc--but unlike Bush, at least Nixon had a few redeeming qualities!
With Bush, it's just all bad. No, compared to Bush, Nixon's legacy is going to look good.
Posted by Ron Russell at November 6, 2005 07:46 PM"With Bush, it's just all bad. No, compared to Bush, Nixon's legacy is going to look good."
Ron, who would every have thought that Nixon would look good.
Posted by Judith at November 6, 2005 07:51 PMI call them repugnanticans as in repugnant.
But you know rethuglicans works for me.
= I'm waiting for dis-armegeddon and non-judgement day.
Posted by librarylady at November 6, 2005 11:42 PMBush is, prima facie, in violation of U.S. Criminal Codes, Section 2441!
Section 2441. War crimesPosted by Earthling at November 7, 2005 06:09 AM(a) Offense. - Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.
It is interesting and prescient that John Dean focused in on the letter in his book ``Worse than Watergate'' and asserted that this letter would provide grounds for impeachment. The book by the way is interesting for the side-by-side comparison of Nixon's White House with W's, but offers no real novelty aside from this argument. Now it may come around to being right.
Posted by calguy at November 7, 2005 09:20 AMStory deserves more play.
www.LiberalUnderground.org
LG
Hey Ron,
You could be right!
At least there is some logic behind your reasoning.
BUT....do you really think the Dems can win with their current strategy? "Bush is the stupidest president ever...and he completely fooled us."
Good Luck, i still choose never
Brian
Posted by at November 7, 2005 10:52 AM
Deserves more play.
www.LIbeRaLunDERgrOUNd.org
LG
If the Democrats want to win, they'd better subpoena the computer programs that Diebold uses to power its voting machines....
Posted by Joel at November 7, 2005 07:41 PMJohn Deans Books, "Worse Than Watergate", published in April of 2004, Details this Problem with Bush's compliance with the Law. He suggested more than 1 1/2 Years ago this was an Impeachable Lapse.
Posted by DM at November 21, 2005 02:21 PM