Unlike Scottie, Tony will give us a truthful, honest, spinless, fair and balanced account of Rove's involvement in exposing a CIA agent during time of war, and he won't invoke the "ongoing investigation" excuse, or perspire.
Now, if you will excuse me, I have a recently extracted wisdom tooth to place under my pillow.
Posted by TIKI AL at April 26, 2006 09:32 AMLying my omission is still, well, lying. Or perjury, if you will.
Posted by ann at April 26, 2006 10:16 AMIf this hapless White House had any feel for planning, they'd have delayed the coronation of Tony Snow another day, or even a week.
Now, all the blogosphere will be chatting about is Rove squealing before Fitz.
Posted by Christopher at April 26, 2006 10:25 AMFitzmas?
Posted by Bagley at April 26, 2006 12:41 PMFitzmas?
Posted by Bagley at April 26, 2006 12:41 PM
*****
Joe and Valerie will be indicted in no time now!
Right, Baglicker?
Posted by God Of War at April 26, 2006 01:01 PMI can see the tea-bagger is out today to do his master's bidding!!
Posted by bbtb at April 26, 2006 01:47 PMI have read all the stories on the web about KKKrl's reapearance before the grand jury and not ONE of them indicated whether or not K was sworn in. If he lies under oath, it's serious. If not sworn in, it's garbage. I'm betting he was not sworn in. He's as slippery as this dope-on-a-rope boss, GeeDubya.
Did you all catch the video of dor(k) intruducing Snow-job? Oh, that fifth grader style. Puke.
Posted by sara swati at April 26, 2006 02:31 PMI have read all the stories on the web about KKKrl's reapearance before the grand jury and not ONE of them indicated whether or not K was sworn in.
I'm sure he was sworn.
Posted by dj moonbat at April 26, 2006 06:35 PMdjmoonbat - what, in the history of this investigation, makes you so sure? Show me.
Posted by sara swati at April 26, 2006 07:25 PM