Screw the GOP infidelities. Them's easy pickings.
Start finding out what infidelities the fscking reporter has had, and start using both in your talkback points.
Mutal Assured Destruction, baby!
Posted by idiosynchronic at June 21, 2006 01:55 PMBroder does a chat on the washingtonpost.com website on Fridays. Submit questions to him on this issue. he tends to be condescending, but he needs to know that people will not stand for a double standard.
Posted by Rich at June 21, 2006 02:40 PMNone of it will ever be mentioned by our media. They are only interested in bjs and the sex lives of the Clintons. Think about this one. If Clinton had had sleep overs with a gay dude, the media would still be making it front page headlines. Idio has it right, let's start a background check into the media. Oh, we could have so much fun blogging.
The GOP has moral values, they just didn't distinquish whose moral values. Dogs come to mind.
Posted by Judith at June 21, 2006 04:11 PMGOP regarding dates: "To me the 8 hours of BS ain't worth the 8 minutes of pleasure. Dogs have the right idea, 1 sniff....she's for me!" -Rodney Dangerfield
Posted by TIKI AL at June 21, 2006 04:24 PMAhem...
David Broder has decided that the issue, rather than her capabilities, is the “elephant in the room” for the national media
Here's a great example of what we were discussing recently: the fictional propaganda storylines our Corporate media creates to keep the public from weighing REAL issues....you know, the ones that affect their everyday lives and those of people all over the world...
It's good that Steve brought it to our attention, but pointing fingers at Republicans that commit adultery isn't really a good way to demonstrate to the average lazy, apathetic half-hearted voter the hypocrisy of Conservative Ideology....
I was thinking more along the lines of, say, someone - ANYONE - pointing out the deficit of character inherent to anyone that would spout off about Jesus Christ and then in the next sentence talk about the justification of slaughtering Iraqi Civilians with Cluster Bombs and Depleted Uranium Shells. That's the CHARACTER DEBATE we should have, if we're going to talk about CHARACTER instead of REAL ISSUES (like when we're going to call off the siege on Iraq and our poorest citizens here at home).
Posted by Tampa Student at June 21, 2006 04:39 PMWhile we are discussing moral values, how about the Senate deciding that $5.15 an hour is more than enough for slave labor. Kennedy proposed an increase (since there hasn't been one since 1997) to $7.25 an hour spread over a two year period for minimum wage. Same old tiresome GOP talking points. "If minimum wage is increased it will hinder companies from creating new jobs." Yeah, all those new jobs, remember? What a bunch of fucks. Burn in hell.
Posted by Judith at June 21, 2006 06:35 PMTampa Student, I agree 100% with your post.
Posted by Judith at June 21, 2006 06:52 PMMarital infidelity with other women is the problem. The idiot son of George Bush got a walk his homosexual indiscretions.
Just go gay, Newtie. They puff. You won't even have to call it sex by Clinto...I mean, your own and neo-con standards.
Posted by phidipides at June 21, 2006 06:59 PM"Bush got a walk his homosexual indiscretions."
Phidipides, well if we only had an Ann Coulter on our side, his gay encounters would be public knowledge.
Posted by Judith at June 21, 2006 07:42 PMYt hw r th mrlly cnfsd t st ny stndrd?
[Editor: ignore=off]Bendittohead: I think Coulter is morally and sexually confused, yet you gopper's think he/she/it is hot.
What is it that attracts you supposedly macho gu(a)y's to this thing, who's sexuality is truly debatable? It looks half-dead, and would be about a great a date as your ex-spouse who just divorced you to produce Tom Cruise's next earthling.
Posted by tempus at June 21, 2006 09:51 PMTampa Student:
I was thinking more along the lines of, say, someone - ANYONE - pointing out the deficit of character inherent to anyone that would spout off about Jesus Christ and then in the next sentence talk about the justification of slaughtering Iraqi Civilians with Cluster Bombs and Depleted Uranium Shells. That's the CHARACTER DEBATE we should have, if we're going to talk about CHARACTER instead of REAL ISSUES (like when we're going to call off the siege on Iraq and our poorest citizens here at home).
TS: Maintain and develop those values. You will be a great asset and hope for the United States in the future.
Do not let money or toys affect your obvious moral character. Do what you know is right, and you will most assuredly make a great difference. The Mahatma would be smiling.
Posted by tempus at June 21, 2006 10:05 PMYet how are the morally confused to set any standard?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Posted by Judith at June 22, 2006 01:25 AMOh I agree. This is the gayest administration ever.
1.) Bush + Jeff Gannon
2.) Ken Mehlman + his right hand
3.) Condi Rice
4.) Rove + Jeff Gannon
To think, I should be happy about it, but why did it have to happen in a Republican administration?
It's just not right, I tell ya'.............
Posted by Christopher at June 22, 2006 08:05 AMI wrote a letter to the NYT which did not get printed basically asking if we could expect stories on GOP hopefuls' infidelitites, since they think it is a legitimate concern. Let's see, but I think Repugnicans dip their willys in holy water first and that makes it all okay.
Posted by Kathleen at June 22, 2006 01:54 PM