Comments: Pentagon Withholding Combat Death Information For Election

It's probably just a coincidence, like announcing Rumsfeld's old ally's death sentence 2 days before the election, when it wasn't even written yet.

Posted by TIKI AL at November 7, 2006 11:15 AM

I'm surprised, at some level, somehow.

Jesus. What won't these war felon freaks do? Really?

I voted.

Posted by paradox at November 7, 2006 11:36 AM

fuckers
absolute crminals

Posted by John B. at November 7, 2006 12:13 PM

Sorry Steve for being off topic here...

"37 counties in Pennsylvania use the ESS & Ivotronic.

These machines are experiencing massive failures.

If you vote for one candidate, the opposing candidate lights up.

Rendell votes are counting for Swann. Santorum votes are counting for Casey and so on

County Boards of Elections or the PA Dept of State are refusing to take action.

They don’t see the disaster that is coming.

Hundreds if not thousands of voters are alerting the authorities of these problems.


This may warrant a revote in these 37 counties."


Get on the phone guys. I don't want to win this way. What's Gov Rendell trying to pull off here?

Posted by peter at November 7, 2006 12:45 PM

HOLY CRAP!

Britney Spears is gettin' divorced!

Thank God CNN let us all know!

Posted by snark at November 7, 2006 01:29 PM

so Rove is using Britney for political reasons too? :)

Posted by at November 7, 2006 01:44 PM

what happens if the vote is so messed up by glitches (real and GOP caused) that it just doesn't produce a result? What if we had to re-vote? or what if the vote was just cancelled and re-scheduled for some time in the future?

Posted by T2 at November 7, 2006 01:50 PM

If that happens I think the Supreme Court gets to decide, no? ;)

Posted by snark at November 7, 2006 01:53 PM

yeah snark, that reminds me that it's to bad Scalia (of the sets no new precedent decisions) isn't hunting with shooter today

Posted by John B. at November 7, 2006 01:57 PM

Bush is keeping our troops in Iraq and in harm's way for political advantage, so this comes as absolutely no suprise.

Posted by ann at November 7, 2006 02:12 PM

No snark, that's a state matter. Each state runs their voting. The SC gets involved when the remedy is incorrect.

How about that 88% of Americans have confidence in the vote count. Just 12%, all of you people, don't feel their vote is counted fairly.

Posted by peter at November 7, 2006 02:31 PM

look, we don't know how many have been killed in Iraq, or injured. We have to rely on Bush and Rummy, proven delusional liars for the information so yeah, who really knows? That's probably the reason Bush has declared the arrival of the US dead back in the states a No Coverage Zone.

Posted by T2 at November 7, 2006 02:38 PM
[Editor: ignore=on]

stv, chck ths rtcl whn y hv tm:

http://www.rlcts.cm/mld/krwshngtn/nws/spcl_pckgs/gllwy/14435366.htm

[Editor: ignore=off]

Posted by scout at November 7, 2006 03:19 PM

Peter, where's the link to your 88% figure?

Posted by Steve Soto at November 7, 2006 03:28 PM
[Editor: ignore=on]

stv, ls, scn ths st; dn't knw th thr, bt h s thnkng clrly:

http://rblnks.blgspt.cm/2006/11/ngrpnt-prpss-pttng-sddm-r.html

[Editor: ignore=off]

Posted by scout at November 7, 2006 03:32 PM
Post a comment
HTML Tags:
<b>Bold</b> = Bold
<i>Italics</i> = Italics
<a href="http://www.url.com/">Linked text</a> = Linked text

Note: comments from signed in commenters will show up right away. If you are not signed in, your comment will not appear until it has been approved.




Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

In order to post a comment, you must answer the following question.