Nobody has been able to hide a nuclear program. Why did so many people swallow this bs on Iraq?
Posted by JohnT at January 2, 2007 07:28 AMI should have added "after WW II"
Posted by JohnT at January 2, 2007 07:43 AMFrom that article you linked regarding WINPAC, I noted this nugget-and remember the article is dated 3/14/01-prior to the attacks, and prior to the PDB (my bolds)-:
Tom Crispell, a CIA spokesman, told WorldNetDaily that because of additional funding appropriated by Congress over the past three years, "we've been engaged in our largest recruiting effort … to hire individuals to focus specifically on … terrorism, proliferation, analysis and human [intelligence] collection overseas."
That would have been when Clinton was President, and would have been done with Democratic support as well.
Just further proof of the lie that Democrats want the terrorists to win.
Posted by Duckman GR at January 2, 2007 10:23 AMWINPAC was pushing the aluminum tubes story.
DO's CPD (Counterproliferation Division) was saying "not so fast."
Posted by Anon at January 2, 2007 11:45 AMPretty convincing case of fraud as defined by the illustrious Elizabeth de la Vega.
Nice job, eR! There are definitely more bodies buried in the graveyard of Bush's misbegotten war policy.
Posted by Mary at January 2, 2007 08:11 PMDear Mr eriposte,
Your prose suffers considerably from your not ever informing your reader what the hell WINPAC stands for.
Posted by mmeo at January 3, 2007 12:39 AMWeapons Intelligence, Nuclear Proliferation and Arms Control Center - as you would have figured out if you clicked the link which mentions when WINPAC was created. I've been talking about WINPAC for more than a year now and sometimes I don't realize that I need to repeat that information.
Posted by eriposte at January 3, 2007 05:30 AM