Brilliant, as usual. Who was the author of the redactions? which agency? They are obviously [thanks to your analyses] conscious and detailed attempts to hide the initial deceptions. Who directed the deletions?
Posted by Mickey at February 2, 2007 07:04 PMNot sure Mickey. We probably won't find out unless the media or Congress investigate the redactions and whether they were justified.
Posted by eriposte at February 2, 2007 07:21 PMAny idea when Rockefellar will be finishing up the last phase of that SSCI report that Roberts stonewalled and eventually decided to never take up? You know the part that was going to take up if the intelligence was ever politicized in anyway....Perhaps they can add the first phase of the SSCI report into their investigation of that question. You know was their (SSCI) intial investigation and reporting into the investigation of the of the intelligence failures politicized or under heavy pressure from a certain someone (hello Deadeye)? The title of the final phase could read something like,
Screwed again! Deadye Dick's influence over Deadye Dick's influence over intelligence failures.
Moving comment to this thread:
eR, bravo! You continue to provide the most comprehensive and most thorough picture on this story. I'm amazed at what you dig out of these documents as they become public. Thanks so much for your intrepid investigations.
Posted by Mary at February 3, 2007 04:44 PM>> Any idea when Rockefellar will be finishing up the last phase of that SSCI report that Roberts stonewalled and eventually decided to never take up?
Not really, sorry emal.
Posted by eriposte at February 3, 2007 09:04 PM