this juror appeared to be the "odd man out" of the group, being pointedly referenced by the foreman in the Valentine's Day stunt. She is reputed to be an educated, clean person, who should have had the intelligence to know better than tainting herself clearly in violation of the court's orders. This could be a case of the juror not wanting to participate any longer, for whatever reason, and taking a easy way out. I can't believe the juror is some kind of plant, but certainly could have rubbed the rest the wrong way for some reason. Perhaps this would explain what seems to be a lengthy deliberation of a relatively clear case.
Posted by T2 at February 26, 2007 09:51 AMI just hate it, give us the answer already.
How fucking hard could it be? I don't like it.
Posted by paradox at February 26, 2007 10:45 AMI hope the defense doesn't think they're going to get a mistrial just because they wore "I'm with guilty"(arrow) t-shirts in the courtroom.
Posted by TIKI AL at February 26, 2007 11:28 AM